[POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Keep our community informed! This forum is for discussing and sharing vore-related information. Post any relevant material and/or links here, and engage in conversations!
Forum rules
This is for general discussion, if you found something you want to post, please use one of the upload forum, if you made something and want to share them, please use the work to be shared forum!

Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Yes
128
44%
No
165
56%
 
Total votes : 293

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby HiddenBird » Mon Nov 27, 2023 5:54 pm

Equating the "meaning of fetishes" with what "people get out of it" is far too reductive - hell, even in the vore community alone people vastly disagree with what is "arousing" and "why".
Synonyms -words that are supposed to mean the same thing- don't even work like this, a "chair" has a much different connotation than a "seat" and it can even mean slightly different things in different contexts.
If we can't equate two very similar words like chair or seat, then we have absolutely no hope in equating two different fetishes.

I think the only sensible interpretation of the initial poll is "Is vore like snuff for you" and for sake of discussion: "how is vore like snuff, and how is it not" or "why or why shouldn't we label things as snuff"
Lets not get to thinking like there's a correct answer here :)

I think the way the question was worded, operate “technically” does have a correct answer, that answer being yes. I did admittedly answer a slightly different question than both you and he proposed, that being is fatal vore necessarily snuff. And if fatal vore is necessarily snuff, at what point does that become the case. (my opinion being functionally never, though i don't think its an unassailable position, especially in cases like cooking and hard vore.). i do think its probably another question with a true answer, albeit a less clear one. And a question i find to be at least reasonably sensible to ponder.
User avatar
HiddenBird
New to the forum
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 4:28 am

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby Trying124 » Mon Nov 27, 2023 8:53 pm

Ah hel lmight as well put my opinion here as well. it absolutely does in my opinion classify as being snuff, but I don't disagree with people who feel that it's different, because it does feel like it's different for the simple fact that no one can swallow another human being whole, whereas snuff is very possible, this means that snuff also by definition includes stuff that contains actual murderers, happening on the screen.
Technically Islamic State beheading videos are "snuff" but Wouldn't count as snuff porn, (at least I really hope not).

because anything that is fatal technically counts as snuff porn, it does come under the broad umbrella category, in the same way that "hard" Vore comes under the same category as Vore, despite being and feeling quite different.

that means it feels a lot easier to describe soft Vore and especially in edge cases like Reformation, or Conscience fat (although I always assumed that this is still fatal, if it's permanent, but that might just be my own preferences) as being something different. Ultimately it all fits under the broad umbrella category. And ultimately we are all hideously deviant freaks for ever visiting this website so we might as well have fun.
TDLR- it is, but it's a subcategory, which is why it feels different to people.
User avatar
Trying124
New to the forum
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:08 am

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby jaggedjagd » Tue Nov 28, 2023 3:57 am

Trying124 wrote:because anything that is fatal technically counts as snuff porn, it does come under the broad umbrella category, in the same way that "hard" Vore comes under the same category as Vore, despite being and feeling quite different.

That's something that always bugged me personally. Always felt like categorizing hard vore as "vore" is kinda wrong. Even as someone who likes both gore and vore. But both hold a very different appeal to me.

Once the prey is dead and/or in chunks when it enters the pred's body, it's not vore. It's just... normal eating. For something to feel like vore, the prey *has* to be alive prior to landing in the pred's belly. Dying after is irrelevant. In the same way some still consider fatal vore snuff, even if the prey comes back to life later.
User avatar
jaggedjagd
Advanced Vorarephile
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby Trying124 » Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:55 pm

jaggedjagd wrote:
Trying124 wrote:because anything that is fatal technically counts as snuff porn, it does come under the broad umbrella category, in the same way that "hard" Vore comes under the same category as Vore, despite being and feeling quite different.

That's something that always bugged me personally. Always felt like categorizing hard vore as "vore" is kinda wrong. Even as someone who likes both gore and vore. But both hold a very different appeal to me.

Once the prey is dead and/or in chunks when it enters the pred's body, it's not vore. It's just... normal eating. For something to feel like vore, the prey *has* to be alive prior to landing in the pred's belly. Dying after is irrelevant. In the same way some still consider fatal vore snuff, even if the prey comes back to life later.

I agree there are different, but surely there fundamentally under the same subcategory? It's something that fits in. Even if it's not a perfect match.
I would also say that anything that involves the prey coming back to life later doesn't count as snuff, in the same way that anything that ends with the character coming back to life or together doesn't count as snuff. It's just gore.

But thank you for an interesting point
User avatar
Trying124
New to the forum
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:08 am

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby BlackWidow552 » Tue Nov 28, 2023 11:13 pm

I might has well add my two cents worth in. This is purely my opinion and should not in anyway make it seem that others opinions are any less valid.

For me it depends on the situation. If the predator is performing the act of vore, be it hard or soft, for the purposes of humiliating or torturing their victim then yes I would class that as snuff. As for porn, well that is subjective to the reader or consumer of such content. If they are sexually aroused by such an act then yes it is porn. If they simply enjoy it for enticing their imagination, but gain no sexual pleasure from it then it is not porn.

Subsequently if the predator performs the act of vore, again hard or soft, simply for the purposes of feeding and as a natural aspect of their survival, then it is not snuff. It can still be classed as porn though if the consumer of the art, story etc gains sexual arousal at such content.

But in my mind the act of eating another person for food as part of a normal diet then it is simply natural, if that is how the person, creature or whatever needs in order to survive and is not snuff and not even murder.

A lion eating a human for example is not snuff, unless another human actually forced the prey human in with the lion for the purposes of creating content for others to watch for pleasure. If however they were simply feeding a human to the lion, because there are too many humans and not enough of the lions normal prey, then it is simply feeding the lion.

Like most things it comes down to the actual context by which the content is created and the nature of the predator. Any way that is my opinion, that does not mean it has to be yours.
User avatar
BlackWidow552
Participator
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:00 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby jaggedjagd » Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:58 am

Trying124 wrote:I agree there are different, but surely there fundamentally under the same subcategory? It's something that fits in. Even if it's not a perfect match.

Sure, hard vore is adjacent to vore, fatal vore is adjacent to snuff. Both are right and wrong. I would use the hard vore tag on gory vore, i would not use the snuff tag on gory vore. There is no objective right/wrong, it's up to personal interpretation.
User avatar
jaggedjagd
Advanced Vorarephile
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby Trying124 » Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:49 pm

jaggedjagd wrote:
Trying124 wrote:I agree there are different, but surely there fundamentally under the same subcategory? It's something that fits in. Even if it's not a perfect match.

Sure, hard vore is adjacent to vore, fatal vore is adjacent to snuff. Both are right and wrong. I would use the hard vore tag on gory vore, i would not use the snuff tag on gory vore. There is no objective right/wrong, it's up to personal interpretation.



obviously personal interpretation plays a huge part in all of this, and there's nothing wrong with just saying "I don't enjoy snuff pornography but I do enjoy vore so I don't consider my stuff to be snuff" but I think that if someone is making a big old list of what fetish comes under what heading, it would either be a Venn diagram, because things can be covered under multiple. I would for example say that bladder vore also comes under the category of water sports, and I think that's unreasonable.
the difficulty with snuff of course and the thing you're all dancing to some extent around, is that snuff is something that you could theoretically do in real life (but you shouldn't) whereas it is a lot easier to understand that swallowing someone down is not physically feasible. Which obviously causes tension in terms of even internal categorisation.

.
BlackWidow552 wrote:Subsequently if the predator performs the act of vore, again hard or soft, simply for the purposes of feeding and as a natural aspect of their survival, then it is not snuff. It can still be classed as porn though if the consumer of the art, story etc gains sexual arousal at such content.


this is a really fascinating way to think about it, because one of my favourite things as predators been very blase about it, do you mean simply for the purposes of feeding, as in it something they have to do otherwise they will perish? Or as in they don't consider the person important enough as anything other than food for it to count to snuff?
again just my 3.5 cents-
User avatar
Trying124
New to the forum
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:08 am

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby BlackWidow552 » Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:42 pm

Trying124 wrote:.
BlackWidow552 wrote:Subsequently if the predator performs the act of vore, again hard or soft, simply for the purposes of feeding and as a natural aspect of their survival, then it is not snuff. It can still be classed as porn though if the consumer of the art, story etc gains sexual arousal at such content.


this is a really fascinating way to think about it, because one of my favourite things as predators been very blase about it, do you mean simply for the purposes of feeding, as in it something they have to do otherwise they will perish? Or as in they don't consider the person important enough as anything other than food for it to count to snuff?
again just my 3.5 cents-


Pretty much yes. They are just food for the predator, if they don't eat they die, there is no malice in their intent. They are not deliberately trying to be cruel, same way a pelican swallows a fish, to them the fish is simply something they must eat to live.
User avatar
BlackWidow552
Participator
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:00 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby Trying124 » Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:56 pm

fascinating, do you think this is still the case even if the predator in question is sentience and understands that the person they're eating this sentiment as well? Or is this exclusive to feral predators do you think?
User avatar
Trying124
New to the forum
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:08 am

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby Daichi777 » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:23 am

You are always going to have people who don't think on fatal digestion as cannibalism and flinching at the thought of it (me being one). And those who just want to take everything technical to the max or without thought or why people do.

You already see this from posts despite the fact the thread is asking "I'm curious if other people consider fatal vore technically "snuff" porn."

If people want to go ahead and give ammo or misinformation to places like Patreon that stupidly consider unwilling vore as rape/sexual violence. By all means, hope you feel better. But it ain't to a lot of us no matter how 'right' you want to try be. Especially for self insert and how it's fantasy and can never be real for the most part.

If the appeal of vore is mainly pre-vore and teasing. Simply being into natural side of things doesn't automatically make you a scat lover. Same with someone dying from it in a story perspective. You're not jacking off to someone's death unless you just want to be technical and do enjoy that.
Image
DISCLAIMER: Due to impersonation & defamation. My official accounts are only on: Patreon, GiantessCity, Aryion, DeviantArt, & Twitter.
User avatar
Daichi777
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:17 am
Location: Australia / NZ

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby BlackWidow552 » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:30 am

Trying124 wrote:fascinating, do you think this is still the case even if the predator in question is sentience and understands that the person they're eating this sentiment as well? Or is this exclusive to feral predators do you think?


Some of the creatures I have written about are sentient, they know they are killing the person and even enjoy the screams, feeding on their fear as much as their flesh. But they still need to eat the human in order to live as humans are their normal prey. But just the way a cat plays with a mouse before eating it, it is still just a natural thing to them and necessary for their survival.

But it can be viewed from either side. I guess it really comes down to the person consuming the story, image or video to determine if they think of it as snuff or just the cycle of life and death.
User avatar
BlackWidow552
Participator
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:00 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby nicktaken » Wed Dec 06, 2023 7:54 pm

Pretty much, yeah.
I write stuff, sometimes: GALLERY
User avatar
nicktaken
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 597
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby minakotomoka14 » Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:26 pm

Yeah sorry but no? This topic is really uncomfortable ngl, idk why it's even being brought up. It's already bad enough vore gets shit on with ignorant people being like "the cannibalism fetish" but yeah sure let's relate it to films of irl people dying, like what the hell? Also I'm sorry but I am not a fan of this recurring theme of lowkey shaming fatal vore fans, I've been kinda noticing it more often and I don't like it, as someone who prefers unwilling fatal vore I'd rather not be made to feel guilty for my preferences by equating it to real life horrific illegal content. As someone who has seen irl gore (and not by my own choice either) I don't want that shit associated with my fantasy fetish in any way, thank you.
Prey-leaning switch gal and writer with a passion for M/F vore and a love for being devoured by giant men of all kinds.
User avatar
minakotomoka14
Advanced Vorarephile
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 8:48 pm
Location: Curled up in a giant's belly~

Re: [POLL] Is fatal vore "snuff" porn?

Postby KnightleyPaine » Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:13 pm

I feel like this is kind of muddled because in its original iteration, "snuff films" referred to where an actual person is being murdered to produce the film.

Despite there being a lot of different terms for fetishized fantasy death however, the "snuff" label became widespread because of magnification through the film industry. The movie 8mm for instance, stars Nicholas Cage as a detective investigating an alleged snuff film, and the idea that somewhere out there are people rich and evil enough to do this sort of thing is just believable enough for the public consciousness to peg it as a possible thing to exist in our time.

As such, "snuff" has been used by more people when first coming into contact with any concept of fetishized death because it's often the only term people knew, and it has since taken over to mean any sort of fetishized fatality, whereby it's usually a broad over-category similar to vore, because the exact method of snuff is often important to people having this fetish. Someone who wants to fantasize about dying of drowning often does not feel the same about dying of disembowelment or gunfire.

This misnomer happens all the time because of how language evolves via public consciousness. "Otaku" is a respectful honorific regarding the master of the house up until enough people use it sarcastically to refer to a shut-in in a derogatory manner, then due to pop-culture changing the reason for being a shut-in is ever more tied to the local nerd culture due to a tendency of introverts to pick those up, particularly in regards to manga and anime. Then people from across the World start labeling themselves this thinking it means fan of manga and anime, and to these people in those language spheres that becomes true. If enough people use it in a way so that it becomes the public understanding, that's can become what it means now.

So now "snuff" has come to mean either the original iteration of fetishized murder, or all fetishized death. For the latter, whereby the venn diagram of overlap with fatal vore just becomes more or less depending on how the fatality is expressed.

What I've found as an iron-stomached person who has at one point or another at least entertained everything at least once to determine whether or not it can be my thing is - that in fetish, there is a constant amount of 'othering', where no matter how niche someone's list of fetishes is, they can always manage to have that one arbitrarily set bridge too far where the people into it must be sick in the head and its existence is evil. This can be anything from homosexuality, feet, furries, NTR, scat, vore, loli/shota, death/"snuff", guro, and so on and so forth. I've seen it go as dumb as bisexuals being into any sort of heterosexuality even though that is literally included in the label, and a lot of cases of Spiderman pointing at other Spiderman level of two fetishes any normie would knee-jerk into finding abhorrent with people into one thinking the other is sick and evil on both sides with utter conviction, like a Furry and a Brony each thinking their community as worthy of empathy but the other is wholly degenerate.

So we get funny shit like in here, where the vore fetishists are throwing the abhorrent, barbarous snuff fetishists under the bus (which is very contraproductive, they're into that at times, I tell you) because we are the misunderstood people that just have a little fetish that people need to have empathy with but fuck those other guys with the fetish we don't understand - they are sick in the head and wholly twisted.

IMHO the emotional need to not overlap with a category out of knee-jerk reaction is unhelpful. Whatever the name is for fetishized death, it absolutely crosses the venn diagram even with the fluffiest type of fatal vore where the fatality is fetishized. The only contention is how encompassing the "snuff" label actually is, which is wholly contingent on its meaning in the public consciousness and in no way up to our community alone.

Currently, as the label is used like on F-List or anywhere with porn tags, everything with death just gets a snuff label, in which case yes, Fatal vore is snuff, and it should be okay because the definition of snuff has become a porn tag that just covers all instances of fantasy fetishized fatality ("Snuff Film" however, is still a specific thing that involves real murder). But curiously, Eka's itself doesn't do it that way with any consistency - then again, Eka's is overall also pretty horrible at consistent tagging in general. We can't tag art right for shit, there's literally several tags for the same thing where the only difference is whether the word has a space in it, and whether or not it's capitalized, or even slightly different expression and that's after the many people running overtime on at least trying to get tag votes going right preventing complete anarchy. We are to tags what the Warrior Cats Wiki was to Warrior Cats facts before the accuracy overhauls, so I'm going to say the local opinion is the cultural outlier.
User avatar
KnightleyPaine
Participator
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:02 pm

Previous

Return to General Vore Discussion