Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Forum rules
This is for general discussion, if you found something you want to post, please use one of the upload forum, if you made something and want to share them, please use the work to be shared forum!
This is for general discussion, if you found something you want to post, please use one of the upload forum, if you made something and want to share them, please use the work to be shared forum!
41 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Never touched boobs so I can't say. But with the right outfit and positioning, they always look nice.
Feel free to critique my work so I can improve in the future.
-
BMUd8854 - Been posting for a bit
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
What's there not to like? Except for the lack of access to them
-
PrivateLewd - New to the forum
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:32 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
SO many viewpoints.
I love seeing, sucking and groping ANY boobs.
I love SENSITIVE boobs. Can you cum from having them sucked, squeezed or fucked? Hell yes!
I love boobs big enough to fuck. But I love smaller boobs with huge (tangerine to orange sized) nipples that are sensitive enough to cum from sucking even more.
Realistically, I know big boobs are a pain. My magnificently boobed wife never complained about her back, but often complained about sweaty boobs, constriction of bras and the difficulty of finding and affording bras her size. And several times she didn't pull them out of the way fast enough when she shut the door. OWCH!
But this is Eka's.
Boob vore.
I don't much like cleavage vore.
But I love nipple vore. Those nips just open wide and suck down their prey. Two wiggly, struggling prey-filled, prey-sized orbs on the chest.
Worth the risk of sucking, but only after they're full.
I love seeing, sucking and groping ANY boobs.
I love SENSITIVE boobs. Can you cum from having them sucked, squeezed or fucked? Hell yes!
I love boobs big enough to fuck. But I love smaller boobs with huge (tangerine to orange sized) nipples that are sensitive enough to cum from sucking even more.
Realistically, I know big boobs are a pain. My magnificently boobed wife never complained about her back, but often complained about sweaty boobs, constriction of bras and the difficulty of finding and affording bras her size. And several times she didn't pull them out of the way fast enough when she shut the door. OWCH!
But this is Eka's.
Boob vore.
I don't much like cleavage vore.
But I love nipple vore. Those nips just open wide and suck down their prey. Two wiggly, struggling prey-filled, prey-sized orbs on the chest.
Worth the risk of sucking, but only after they're full.
-
Siuddithsi - ---
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:35 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
To quote fishstickonastickTF2, "All booba is good booba."
I am partial to large breasts, but that's mainly in a fantasy sense.
I am partial to large breasts, but that's mainly in a fantasy sense.
-
Slingshot47 - New to the forum
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:27 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
I actually can’t stand big boobs, as someone who has them IRL they’re a literal and figurative pain. It translates to fantasy and my not being able to suspend disbelief, cause I think about how their backs must hurt so bad! And they probably have a hard time sleeping! And their clothes must be terribly difficult to purchase cause of their chest size!
…Yeah, I’m not the most fun! Average to small is my fave.
…Yeah, I’m not the most fun! Average to small is my fave.
Average M/f enjoyer
-
Lonnie - Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 12:37 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
boob good
my beloved has some pretty hefty ones and i can literally hear her back crack when i walk up to her and just hold the weight of them for a minute or two so she can stand without their burden
i have a similar but less intense problem with them
but im fucking glad i have em
squish squish lol
my beloved has some pretty hefty ones and i can literally hear her back crack when i walk up to her and just hold the weight of them for a minute or two so she can stand without their burden
i have a similar but less intense problem with them
but im fucking glad i have em
squish squish lol
-
Brainfood - Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:01 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Lonnie wrote:I actually can’t stand big boobs, as someone who has them IRL they’re a literal and figurative pain. It translates to fantasy and my not being able to suspend disbelief, cause I think about how their backs must hurt so bad! And they probably have a hard time sleeping! And their clothes must be terribly difficult to purchase cause of their chest size!
…Yeah, I’m not the most fun! Average to small is my fave.
It's quite easy to tell which posters are men and have no idea what boobs feel like for a woman.
-
CandySquirrel - Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:35 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
PsychicClown wrote:As my friend says "Women are temporary, Games are eternal!"
I can't say I have a preference over one or the other though.
Big boobs over small boobs though.
Is your friend an alpha male
-
ManEater1777 - New to the forum
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 2:06 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Tits are only good for 2 things: Feeding babies and becoming inflammation city when your period approaches.
-
jaggedjagd - Advanced Vorarephile
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Whirlhoof wrote:the most valuable of all assets:
THIGHS AND HIPS UNF
Actual truth.
-
jaggedjagd - Advanced Vorarephile
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
CandySquirrel wrote:Lonnie wrote:I actually can’t stand big boobs, as someone who has them IRL they’re a literal and figurative pain. It translates to fantasy and my not being able to suspend disbelief, cause I think about how their backs must hurt so bad! And they probably have a hard time sleeping! And their clothes must be terribly difficult to purchase cause of their chest size!
…Yeah, I’m not the most fun! Average to small is my fave.
It's quite easy to tell which posters are men and have no idea what boobs feel like for a woman.
When I see an image with massive hypercock bulging, I don't get pulled out of the fantasy trying to imagine how much harder it is to get into pants or how much it chafes against my thighs.
I totally understand not enjoying the visual of huge breasts, but the way I see it, the point of pornography is self-indulgent imagination. Making depictions of people *real* to my mind (as opposed to objectifying them) is entirely spoiling the good time I'm trying to have while alone in my computer chair. I want to shamelessly enjoy the sexual scenario presented without making consideration of how much struggle the daily lives are for the subjects of an image. Outside of the context of trying to relieve myself of my arousal, sure, I'll sympathize with real people trying to navigate modern lives, but it sorta drives me nuts every time someone in gallery comments entreats us all to consider the back pain of a well-breasted 20-something woman getting devoured alive by dragon or whatever.
-
Assimilation - Advanced Vorarephile
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 11:00 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
I like natural boobs that are nice in shape and not oversized, having nice smooth transitions with the rest of her chest i.e. the cleavage just barely presses together forming a nice U shaped hollow that gets narrower downward. Also, the classic hourglass figure is my favourite, and breasts are important for that. This figure I find perfect for vore due to reasons mentioned latter.
A little background:
I am a hetero cis dude who is prey and strictly into oral vore, esp concluding with full tour or disposal, by seductive female predators with femme fatale vibes. My vore scenario can be either as a tiny (say 5-8 cm or 2-3 inches) with a normal sized woman or as my life size with a giantess large enough to physically swallow me whole and alive. Either I or my indigestible remains must then be passed through the narrower parts of her digestive tract and ultimately defecated by her without causing her undo discomfort. If I am large enough to be a difficult but possible swallow, and detectable by the tactile nerves in her anal canal...either as a whole me or as a lump in her bowel movement that is best.
Classic hourglass shaped women are perfect for my predators because:
1. I love it when my predator moves her finger-tip downward into her cleavage, tracing my journey down her oesophagus. Medium sized firm breasts with hollow, U shaped cleavage are perfect for this.
2. The hourglass shaped figure of my predator somehow provides outward milestones for my internal progress down her digestive tract: As I am sucked through her pyloric sphincter and carried by her peristalsis down into her bowels below, I pass through the narrow of her waist and descend toward the wider lower anatomy of her hips and buttocks.....and am eventually dumped into her rectum, where I will wait to be defecated by her.
A little background:
I am a hetero cis dude who is prey and strictly into oral vore, esp concluding with full tour or disposal, by seductive female predators with femme fatale vibes. My vore scenario can be either as a tiny (say 5-8 cm or 2-3 inches) with a normal sized woman or as my life size with a giantess large enough to physically swallow me whole and alive. Either I or my indigestible remains must then be passed through the narrower parts of her digestive tract and ultimately defecated by her without causing her undo discomfort. If I am large enough to be a difficult but possible swallow, and detectable by the tactile nerves in her anal canal...either as a whole me or as a lump in her bowel movement that is best.
Classic hourglass shaped women are perfect for my predators because:
1. I love it when my predator moves her finger-tip downward into her cleavage, tracing my journey down her oesophagus. Medium sized firm breasts with hollow, U shaped cleavage are perfect for this.
2. The hourglass shaped figure of my predator somehow provides outward milestones for my internal progress down her digestive tract: As I am sucked through her pyloric sphincter and carried by her peristalsis down into her bowels below, I pass through the narrow of her waist and descend toward the wider lower anatomy of her hips and buttocks.....and am eventually dumped into her rectum, where I will wait to be defecated by her.
Last edited by DACITEDOME on Fri Aug 19, 2022 1:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
DACITEDOME - New to the forum
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:46 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
The wonderful thing about titties
Is titties are wonderful things
Is titties are wonderful things
- TSaPA
- Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:11 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
A pair of fat tats is always nice, but honestly butts are better. A big fat bubble butt can do almost anything a busty chest can do, and a lot more. Not to mention, it doesn't cause back problems for the lady. Butts also line up more with the digestive tract, as well.
The Azure Phoenix will spread his wings and fly with only the most Royal of Blue flares.
-
AzurePheonix - Advanced Vorarephile
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:33 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Pretty sexy. I’m more of a thigh and butt gal, but I can appreciate a nice pair of boobs.
Not huge on really large boobs since it’s hard to find clothes that don’t automatically show cleavage and the back pain.
Not huge on really large boobs since it’s hard to find clothes that don’t automatically show cleavage and the back pain.
-
PigeonsFedora - Been posting for a bit
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 1:48 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
I'm okay with breasts as long as they are realistic (and by that I mean a realistic size).
Overdeveloped breasts almost make me sick.
Also, I'm okay with breasts as long as they are on a mammal character. Let me rephrase that : Dragons are oviparous, they don't breastfeed their younglings, so the shouldn't have breasts.
Overdeveloped breasts almost make me sick.
Also, I'm okay with breasts as long as they are on a mammal character. Let me rephrase that : Dragons are oviparous, they don't breastfeed their younglings, so the shouldn't have breasts.
- LightDragon
- Participator
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:16 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
100% a boob man. And the bigger they are, the more people she’s eaten. Hell I’d offer myself up to be a new pair of tits.
Click here for free food (I’m the food)
- bongobongo
- Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:07 am
- Location: In your stomach if you’d like ;)
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
I like them big as long as they're not bigger than her head. I enjoy it when their cartoonishly perky, I don't really like it when they sag like real life :p
Not a fan of small or flat chested really
Not a fan of small or flat chested really
-
Mokii - Been posting for a bit
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:46 am
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
Ah, the breasts.
One of the most prominent secondary sex characteristics of a human female.
So the question mostly is rather not if but how one likes them.
Sizeable breasts, especially when paired with a lean abdomen, is a good sign of high levels of estrogens or/and her tissues ability to respond to them, since her breasts and likely thighs absorb most excess nutrients leaving her offspring carrying belly unencumbered; i.e. exceptional hormonal health, which is an attractive feature.
Talking about fantasy and art(and perhaps reality too sometimes) certain moderation is needed thou. Assets so big that it starts looking inconvenient for the owner, when it looks like they kind of get in the way, don't seem particularly pleasant.
When they are bigger than her head, it starts to feel like too much, indeed.
Shape is definitely important too. It would be a sign of young age again, I guess.
I find youthful teardrop shape with nipples about perpendicular to her torso the most aesthetically pleasant.
Mythical creatures, therefore they don't exist. Or can look w/e an author wants them to.
Anthropomorphic implies it's sort of a hybrid/chimera or at least literally largely shaped like humans.
Btw, even in real world presence of scales doesn't prevent pangolins from producing milk. Pigeons, some fish species and even insects produce nutritious secretions to feed their offspring, production of which is even controlled by the same hormone (prolactin).
Besides, the main purpose of a fantasy fetish character is to be exorbitantly attractive; so designs above all else should serve this purpose, and fantasy logic(which I like things to have as well) should try to justify it. And a pair of tits is too big of a feature to pass even for most furries.
One of the most prominent secondary sex characteristics of a human female.
So the question mostly is rather not if but how one likes them.
Sizeable breasts, especially when paired with a lean abdomen, is a good sign of high levels of estrogens or/and her tissues ability to respond to them, since her breasts and likely thighs absorb most excess nutrients leaving her offspring carrying belly unencumbered; i.e. exceptional hormonal health, which is an attractive feature.
Talking about fantasy and art(and perhaps reality too sometimes) certain moderation is needed thou. Assets so big that it starts looking inconvenient for the owner, when it looks like they kind of get in the way, don't seem particularly pleasant.
When they are bigger than her head, it starts to feel like too much, indeed.
Shape is definitely important too. It would be a sign of young age again, I guess.
I find youthful teardrop shape with nipples about perpendicular to her torso the most aesthetically pleasant.
LightDragon wrote:Dragons are
Mythical creatures, therefore they don't exist. Or can look w/e an author wants them to.
Anthropomorphic implies it's sort of a hybrid/chimera or at least literally largely shaped like humans.
Btw, even in real world presence of scales doesn't prevent pangolins from producing milk. Pigeons, some fish species and even insects produce nutritious secretions to feed their offspring, production of which is even controlled by the same hormone (prolactin).
Besides, the main purpose of a fantasy fetish character is to be exorbitantly attractive; so designs above all else should serve this purpose, and fantasy logic(which I like things to have as well) should try to justify it. And a pair of tits is too big of a feature to pass even for most furries.
-
PaperCat - New to the forum
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:02 pm
Re: Whats the general consensus on tits? :3
I'll be honest I like all sizes. I like good ratios of the three sizes. With vore I like both weight gain and no gain aftermath for those fatal digestion images. I do find breast vore with equal gain when voring two different sized people weird, but not balancing out would look even weirder so give and take with it.
-
Grimoutsider - New to the forum
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:54 pm
41 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3