wondering
Forum rules
Cause of this section. See here
Formerly called "Extra softvore". Which imply vore that are generally safe. In additional for this particular form, we accept worksafe only material, that means no violent and no sexual contain (ie. No blood, no scat, no digestion, etc) allowed here. See forum's sticky before posting please!
Read them in detail here
Cause of this section. See here
Formerly called "Extra softvore". Which imply vore that are generally safe. In additional for this particular form, we accept worksafe only material, that means no violent and no sexual contain (ie. No blood, no scat, no digestion, etc) allowed here. See forum's sticky before posting please!
Read them in detail here
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The current chant
Hi!
Well, with the current restrictions, UB is basically not allowed here because of its inherent violation of the no nudity rule.
The emotion behind a situation/depiction is not enough to ignore rules about depiction (even if both predator and prey love it and consider it a wonderful experience between two consenting individuals, a violent vore situation resulting in the death of the prey would still be not allowed here). Unless such exceptions are thoroughly regulated, they can lead to confusion and result in rules becoming completely ineffective.
However, please note that there is no rule per se which says "no UB!", so if you are able to avoid the nudity part (e.g. having the predator teleport the prey into her womb), I think you would be alright. Just leaving out the part may not be enough, though, since depending on how you depict the final situation, you may very well cause the viewer to automatically fill in the gap in a most explicit way (for instance if the predator showed heavy breathing or other symptoms of hard physical activity).
Please note that the section is still young and in its formative phase, so the rules may change depending on what is necessary.
Deathworks
Well, with the current restrictions, UB is basically not allowed here because of its inherent violation of the no nudity rule.
The emotion behind a situation/depiction is not enough to ignore rules about depiction (even if both predator and prey love it and consider it a wonderful experience between two consenting individuals, a violent vore situation resulting in the death of the prey would still be not allowed here). Unless such exceptions are thoroughly regulated, they can lead to confusion and result in rules becoming completely ineffective.
However, please note that there is no rule per se which says "no UB!", so if you are able to avoid the nudity part (e.g. having the predator teleport the prey into her womb), I think you would be alright. Just leaving out the part may not be enough, though, since depending on how you depict the final situation, you may very well cause the viewer to automatically fill in the gap in a most explicit way (for instance if the predator showed heavy breathing or other symptoms of hard physical activity).
Please note that the section is still young and in its formative phase, so the rules may change depending on what is necessary.
Deathworks
-
Deathworks - Innocence and Cuteness!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: Germany
Re: The current chant
ok, i see, thats good ^^ or... maybe it could be done like the science way? a person gets shrunk down, enters the other's body but somehow enters the womb then grows back to normal, thus getting trapped in? is that against the rules?
-
Z_Evil - Intermediate Vorarephile
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:00 am
Re: The current chant
As long as no one is getting "turned on" during it and it doesn't show that part of the woman, it should be fine.
Proudly using words like sugar, sauce, candy, sucker, milkshake, and cherry without any double meaning.
-
Ciriun - Somewhat familiar
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: New York
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1