girl2change wrote:Oooh! Can we review that needless reply in the same manner? I'll start:
Meh. Unimaginative response that privileges the poster's desires over the merits of the original link.
Wow, you criticized a needless reply with a needless (by your definition) reply that privileges your desires over the original link OR this moribund, dead forum that clearly needs more replies of every type to avoid eventual deletion! Frankly, when your forum receives a new post on average every two weeks, there are no needless replies!
Also, since you are clearly so lacking in intelligence, may I remind you that "unimaginative" is in fact a word that describes merit AND why it would lack it! The "meh" also describes the effect upon the viewer of the original post. As for my response, if it seemed "unimaginative" that is merely because it is short and shows economy of language, which is another way of saying that it doesn't NEED to be imaginative and in fact is better because it isn't!
Nice try, bimbo! Play again sometime.