Any way to block posts from a certain usename?

[night22]

How do you use this thing? I've got greasemonkey, but the steps to using this blocker are confusing and nonexistent.

[tigercloud]

@WHTB:

Spoiler: show

You can get the script here until/if WHTB merges the changes

Considering how much more work you're doing on it than I am right now, maybe we should just say your repository is the "official" one.

If you want to be my Repo as Main repo - sure.

@extremelydevious:

Spoiler: show

(...)
Also a temporary per-search filter option for certain tags at least could be handy, theres certain things i just dont search for because of how much i have to sift through to find it.

As said it take to much time to implement it... And it may work not perfect as told in my long long post.

We can it implement for the sites where blacklisting already work but thats all. It take me to long time to create a whole system just for a few user =/ Maybe someone else is willing to implement it? Maybe I'm if im done with my other projects but that will take some time until that

How do you use this thing? I've got greasemonkey, but the steps to using this blocker are confusing and nonexistent.

• Install Greasemonkey
• Click on "Manage UserScripts" like me:
  Spoiler: show

  

  new_userScript.jpg (25.01 KiB) Viewed 10558 times

  
  
  • Then click "New UserScript"
    
    • Name the Script "Eka's Portal Disinterest Filter" or different if you want - it doesn't matter
    • Set the Namespace to "http://zcxv.com/"
    • Make sure that all other fields are empty (They will set by the script itself)
  • Click on "Settings" on your script
    
    • Click on "Edit UserScript" like me:
      Spoiler: show

      

    • Then a window appear with some code within it. Delete the pregenerated code!
    • Copy and paste the whole Code from here into that window and click "save"

Sorry for the German-Language screens but idk how to change the lang to english... May some words can be different as i have told you

If you found a bug post it here or on github

[night22]

How do you use this thing? I've got greasemonkey, but the steps to using this blocker are confusing and nonexistent.

• Install Greasemonkey
• Click on "Manage UserScripts" like me:
  Spoiler: show

  new_userScript.jpg
  
  
  • Then click "New UserScript"
    
    • Name the Script "Eka's Portal Disinterest Filter" or different if you want - it doesn't matter
    • Set the Namespace to "http://zcxv.com/"
    • Make sure that all other fields are empty (They will set by the script itself)
  • Click on "Settings" on your script
    
    • Click on "Edit UserScript" like me:
      Spoiler: show

      editScript.jpg
    • Then a window appear with some code within it. Delete the pregenerated code!
    • Copy and paste the whole Code from here into that window and click "save"

Sorry for the German-Language screens but idk how to change the lang to english... May some words can be different as i have told you

If you found a bug post it here or on github

Ah it worked perfectly, thanks! I did all that before, but I didn't use zxcv as the namespace.

[WHTB]

Ah it worked perfectly, thanks! I did all that before, but I didn't use zxcv as the namespace.

I don't think the namespace really matters. My domain is zcxv, though. Not zxcv.

[necryel]

From the perspective of a wanna-be-artist, I really don't like this idea. I get where you are coming from with it, but as I understand it, this site is for the artists first, and the viewers second. No one makes you look at their art, but you might have to at least click past it. A little repetitive effort that could get annoying, but not much of anything compared with the artists' effort to continue generating new stuff.

The reason I don't like this idea is that it could quickly create an atmosphere where Newbie Artist submits their first, very rough and kinda bad work, and almost everyone blocks them because they don't want to see more of that. A year later, Newbie Artist has gotten a lot better, and been posting gradual improvements all along... but no one ever comments or gives them feedback, positive or negative, aside from maybe a rare few favs from 1 or 2 folks who don't use the block feature very much, or weren't around when Newbie Artist first started. So Newbie Artist gives up.

I get the intent, and it wouldn't be that much different from what we all probably do when an artist or author we know we don't particularly like posts stuff and just scroll past it; but when I still see a title and header, I'm always at least tempted to check and see "what is this?" if it's something that fits my interests. Also my memory isn't that great. So I feel that there's always a chance for an improving artist to start gaining more followers and fans from audiences who previously didn't know or didn't care for their work. I feel like this would put more pressure on new artists to make sure whatever the first thing they post is amazing, because otherwise, there will be a large portion of folks who will never even SEE their posts or consider their work again.

I can see your concern here, but the point behind the need for an effective blacklist is not about discriminating against budding or emerging artists to create some elitist community, but rather that there are some genres and subjects matters which some viewers either have no interest in at all or find some subject matters extremely disturbing. Now, most artists are away of what these "controversial topics" are and do a good job of applying the relevant tags to their works as a fair warning. However, we've seen a recent rash of artists who deal heavily in such topics and who either refuse to or completely avoid tagging their works with any applicable controversial tags thus cheating the current black listing system. Since all submissions have atleast the artist's account name as a universal tag, individual users can blacklist individual artists who's main choice of subject matter they do not wish to see at all. Since the current tagging system is not compulsory and there aren't enough staff to preview all new submissions before they're published to the main page there is currently no way to avoid seeing unwanted content when an artist chooses to not tag their works. Again, the focus is not about an artist's level of talent, but rather about an artistic predominant subject matter in their work and whether or not they responsibly tag their works. If every artist responsibly tagged their work or there was adequate staffing to administratively review and tag all work before its seen by the public, then an artist based blacklist would not be necessary, but such is not the case and therefore more sensitive viewers require a means of protecting themselves from the types of content and images they simply do not want to see or even be notified of.

[Eka]

However, we've seen a recent rash of artists who deal heavily in such topics and who either refuse to or completely avoid tagging their works with any applicable controversial tags thus cheating the current black listing system.

Tagging controversial stuff such as underage, vore type, etc. All of those are mandatory. If artist doesn't tag it. Please correct this issue properly by reporting them.

[KingKabal777]

However, we've seen a recent rash of artists who deal heavily in such topics and who either refuse to or completely avoid tagging their works with any applicable controversial tags thus cheating the current black listing system.

Tagging controversial stuff such as underage, vore type, etc. All of those are mandatory. If artist doesn't tag it. Please correct this issue properly by reporting them.

Eka is correct. Shotacon like images can be permitted, but as the legal case by case basis applies, the type of vore should be added in the series if it has vore. If it's non-vore, then it needs to be tagged as non-vore, if it's a set type of vore, IE hard vore, soul vore, etc, then it needs to be tagged as such, there's no limit on how many
tags you can use. As Eka said, all people MUST tag their material, otherwise tag it yourself for them. All shotacon material MUST be tagged as Shota or Shotacon and INCLUDE the term
UNDERAGE. If it becomes a technical issue, complain to the administration or moderator about it or tag it yourself. I always tag everything I have to describe it.

> Avoid tagging in works with controversal tags

You can't avoid tagging works with controversal material. That's not permitted, you have to tag material as such. If a character is suspected to be a minor or of questionable age in a fictional series, see examples below for more clarification, then the UNDERAGE tag MUST BE USED. Shotacon and Lolicon images must be
used. Non-vore images that are explicit in nature, such as ecchi or hentai must have a verified age, if in doubt, label it underage, if still in doubt, contact the administrator and ask if it should be tagged as such. This is a legal requirement, and if that material was not required to be tagged, then the administrator and
others could be under serious consequences.


There is cases involving this: If it's vore, there's a certain kind that must be identified. If it's involving a shotacon character (IE: Toon Link, Ben Tennyson, Dan Kuso, etc), then the tags Shota or Shotacon must be used, and the tag Underage with it, whether pred or not. The definition of underaged characters or Shotacon like characters is taken from urbandictionary to give a clear definition:

Anime or Manga that feature underaged boys (6-12 years of age). Most Shotacon, Or Shota, Is directed to a female audience, and centers around a yaoi plot.
Most Shota is banned on websites, but its still fully legal in Japan.

Loli is the female form of Shota.

This rule should also apply to LOLICON, which is considered underage, some examples include (Aelita Shaeffer, Adeleine from Kirby 64, Paula Polestar, etc), if the person choose not to tag that type of material either, either TAG IT for them, or report them to the administration.

IF in doubt on age of a character, add the underage tag, and shota or loli. If declined by the user, notify a moderator or administrator who controls the site.

IF the administrator finds that the character is not a shota or loli like character, then the underage tag and the loli/shota tag is not required. Otherwise, if it
appears to be of questionable age, then the tag is required.

"However, we've seen a recent rash of artists who deal heavily in such topics and who either refuse to or completely avoid tagging their works with any applicable controversial tags thus cheating the current black listing system."

That is true, many artists deal heavily in such topics, I've witnessed this as well, you can do this yourself and save yourself the trouble, but if the user refused to accept
the tag and you believe it should be tagged as such, contact EKA.

From Eka, with corrections: "Tagging controversial stuff such as underage, vore type, etc. All of those things are mandatory. If a artist doesn't tag it, please correct this issue properly by reporting them to the administrator or staff."

Technically, if I am correct, Eka, please correct me if I'm wrong, this is very likely a legal requirement regarding controversal material, all of that must be tagged, because if such was not to be required to be tagged, then this website can be a haven for any type of illegal and questionable material, and nobody would want that to happen. If this is a legal requirement, she can't change that rule, but if it's not, then Eka can control what decisions she makes on this website. I technically believe that this may be a legal requirement, and she may not have control over whether people are required to tag it or not, but she very likely is required to have people tag material on her site. Don't like it, don't come here to this site, it's that simple. Someone not complying, contact Eka to see if it can be resolved.

[tigercloud]

Ah it worked perfectly, thanks! I did all that before, but I didn't use zxcv as the namespace.

I don't think the namespace really matters. My domain is zcxv, though. Not zxcv.

It doesn't matter but it was a req. field =/

Thinking some days about implementing Black-List Tags. Eka is it possible to show Tags on the message.php - Page (e.g. in a hidden div? - just to access the tags of every element) That would it make possible to filter them or is it possible to add the build-in blacklist system to the message.php page?

Tagging controversial stuff such as underage, vore type, etc.

Whats about these Advertisements (or as I say 'Fake Images'), is it required to tag them as "ad" or similar? Half of my Messages are such stuff and I'm trying to get rid of these (atm by blocking specific user) bec I don't wanna see them. - I'm ok if artists want support but some user excessive or almost only Posting this stuff. I thought this is a community site not an free ad site.
I'm ok if here on Ekas are Ads (I have my Adblock disabled for this site - but Ekas don't have Ads all the Years) but Ads have not be hidden within the Messages/Posts.
I'm fine if someone post an ad for her/himself sometimes, but last time that become more worse with those ads

[KingKabal777]

Ah it worked perfectly, thanks! I did all that before, but I didn't use zxcv as the namespace.

I don't think the namespace really matters. My domain is zcxv, though. Not zxcv.

It doesn't matter but it was a req. field =/

Thinking some days about implementing Black-List Tags. Eka is it possible to show Tags on the message.php - Page (e.g. in a hidden div? - just to access the tags of every element) That would it make possible to filter them or is it possible to add the build-in blacklist system to the message.php page?

Tagging controversial stuff such as underage, vore type, etc.

Whats about these Advertisements (or as I say 'Fake Images'), is it required to tag them as "ad" or similar? Half of my Messages are such stuff and I'm trying to get rid of these (atm by blocking specific user) bec I don't wanna see them. - I'm ok if artists want support but some user excessive or almost only Posting this stuff. I thought this is a community site not an free ad site.
I'm ok if here on Ekas are Ads (I have my Adblock disabled for this site - but Ekas don't have Ads all the Years) but Ads have not be hidden within the Messages/Posts.
I'm fine if someone post an ad for her/himself sometimes, but last time that become more worse with those ads

Do you mean specifically "fakes", like the ones seen on rule34.paheal.net? If so, that needs to be tagged, and it is EXTREMELY controversal to that site, for example, posting a non-vore fake of Gordon Ramsay here that you didn't make without permission is forbidden. Making your own fake of him via photoshop or photo manipulation
tools is considered controversal, we don't know much factor in determining whether it truly is controversal as it is modified.

If you're technically not referring to ones on paheal, then link a example here if Eka will allow you to.

Commission advertisements should be tagged as such with a example price list and tagged with describing what the picture in the example is about. But NOTE THIS:

THERE IS A COMMISSION INFO PAGE ON EACH USER PROFILE. You can use that to bring commission information to others for you. A gallery can also provide examples of artwork, don't know how to get one? Contact Eka and provide proof of artwork ownership, and she'll open one for you.

If you look on paheal, they lay it out like this, and I can be certain Eka would lay it out in the same manner as they do.:

1. Under no circumstances will Child Pornography be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS. This includes realistic simulations and fakes, all "fakes" that portray an underage actor / singer etc. They are not permitted and any Child Pornography posters will receive a permanent ban and your relevant information passed onto your local authorities; we cannot stress this enough. Underage means under 18 years since exiting the womb.

2. Be cautious with fakes in general. Not only should they not show someone who's underage in reality, if we suspect any human part of a fake is underage, we may remove it without warning. We also reserve the right to wipe any other fakes uploaded by you, or on that day, or in extreme cases in that whole tag. The law is generally not kinder to this stuff than the real stuff, and neither are we.

[tigercloud]

No, I just name them fake images because on your message site they look like an nice picture but then its an patreon ad or some other stuff thats cut away aka they are not really images/stories^^ The message.php site become more and more obsolete for me, because of the massive amount of Ads in my watched Tags, so it would be nice to filter out Tags (i.e. Advertisement - My question was, is the Advertisement Tag required for the artist to add?)

I don't talked about that underage topic at all in my post, but may it was not clear >.<

Idk that rule34 site, what is there?

I mean Ads in generall not only these underage stuff. But the current Black-List System doesn't hide Black-List-Tags on the Message-Page See here - So there is no cheating, if you don't wanna see such stuff, it will also appears in your message page if the bad post has a tag, thats watched by you!

My Questions:
- Is it required for Artists to add the "Advertisement"-Tag if its an Advertisement?
- It is possible for Eka to add Tags on the message.php - Page (maybe in a hidden div), so that we can filter blacklisted Tags out?
-- Or is it possible to use the Site-Blacklist also on the message.php - Page?

[KingKabal777]

No, I just name them fake images because on your message site they look like an nice picture but then its an patreon ad or some other stuff thats cut away aka they are not really images/stories^^ The message.php site become more and more obsolete for me, because of the massive amount of Ads in my watched Tags, so it would be nice to filter out Tags (i.e. Advertisement - My question was, is the Advertisement Tag required for the artist to add?)

I don't talked about that underage topic at all in my post, but may it was not clear >.<

Idk that rule34 site, what is there?

I mean Ads in generall not only these underage stuff. But the current Black-List System doesn't hide Black-List-Tags on the Message-Page See here - So there is no cheating, if you don't wanna see such stuff, it will also appears in your message page if the bad post has a tag, thats watched by you!

My Questions:
- Is it required for Artists to add the "Advertisement"-Tag if its an Advertisement?
- It is possible for Eka to add Tags on the message.php - Page (maybe in a hidden div), so that we can filter blacklisted Tags out?
-- Or is it possible to use the Site-Blacklist also on the message.php - Page?

You might have to get the first two questions answered by Eka herself. The third one, no idea, but I do wish Leshana and Eka would be able to exclude certain tags in searches without having to install something like Greasemonkey or similar.

[tigercloud]

be able to exclude certain tags in searches without having to install something like Greasemonkey or similar.

If you use the normal Blacklist it is "excluded" from searches. The main Problem is the Messages-Page which has no option to exclude Tags.

[KingKabal777]

be able to exclude certain tags in searches without having to install something like Greasemonkey or similar.

If you use the normal Blacklist it is "excluded" from searches. The main Problem is the Messages-Page which has no option to exclude Tags.

Kind of wish the site was like Sankaku complex for vore fans.

[tigercloud]

Fixed Issue #3 - G4 Messages "Load x more from x" don't detect blocked content

If you use it, you might step by and get the Update If you are lazy and don't know github much, here is the direct link to the file

[Gone]

Unfortunately you can't block posts of actual art, but if you add someone to your 'foe' list you can't see their forum posts.

[tigercloud]

With the Script you can block the Art of an specific artist. If you add "Tigercloud" for example, you will never see my art (if i would post something in the future^^)

See the Screenshots in this Post (within the Spoiler)

But the Script don't block forum posts.

[tigercloud]

Hello,

it's a little ago but I updated the Script again. Its a bit easier to install because you can now just click on a link and get it installed.

I added:

• Auto-Update
• Auto-Install

I changed:

• Removed ugly Buttons (previously added by me to avoid page-reloading) and use now REAL Buttons instead
• Changed Color for shown Blocked-Content to a less aggressive Background-Color

Code changes:

Spoiler: show

• Use now the "===" Operator instead of the "==" to avoid type coercion
• Reformat Code
• Use Tab instead of spaces for indent
• Added missing types to JS-Doc

[tigercloud]

I finished that Script. It has now all functions. Sorry for digging this Topic out but I want notify you, that Version 1.0.0 is finally done^^ You can find it as usually here: https://github.com/Petschko/EkasPortalDisinterestFilter

Lastest changes:

Added:

• Import-Function (From JSON-Text-File)
• Export-Function (To JSON-Text-File)

Removed:

• Branch to handle the Main-Page (Reason: I can't detect from which user the Items are on the Startpage)

If there are still bugs just report them here or on the Github page.

Finally I finished that and I don't have this in my head anymore^^ - Today is issue-run on Github >.<
See you

Tigercloud

[tigercloud]

Just a quick update:

If you are using Firefox and updated to Version to 57.x, Greasemonkey won't work anymore. Mozilla removed their old extension API and that's why many AddOns are removed (or don't run properly) while updating to 57. Therefore the Script will also not work anymore if you are using Firefox 57(+)
May somebody find a workaround to it. Please post it here then. May there is a similar AddOn like Greasemonkey for FF 57+

You can wait until Greasemonkey make it run properly on FF 57 or switch to an other Browser.

If you are using Firefox I recommend to check every AddOn if it's compatible with FF 57 BEFORE Updating (If there is a LEGACY-Flag behind the Addon it will removed after the update to 57)

Please do it, around 8/10 Plugins are "Old" and get removed after the update!
If you still want to use the Firefox with all AddOns you can also switch to the ESR-Version (Firefox 52) (What's that?) And still get Security Updates for "Old" Firefox v.52 until Jun 2018

Edit: Greasemonkey works now in FF 57

Edit 2: On some other PCs it doesn't work....

[tigercloud]

Hey,

I decided to drop the Support for "Greasemonkey", since I had to rewrite the Script. I support just Tamermonkey, which is now also avialable for Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... permonkey/

With Tampermonkey all works normal like back then. If you should switch from Greasemonkey to Tampermonkey your Blocked User-List is transfered automaticly (it's stored in your Local-Storage of your browser).

That was all about the FF57 update, I hope this was all so long^^

Edit: Greasemonkey is not really stable anymore if you also look at the Comments there: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... y/reviews/